March 17, 2003

UN inspectors or the President

The time has come for Americans to decde whether they will meekly submit to the wishes of the President, or if we will rejoin the world with open eyes and truly examine what is going on with Iraq.

The stories from the head of the inspections teams, Hans Blix are radically different from what is pawned off on us by the Bush Administration on its media puppets.

Why puppets? Why else would they suppress reports at home and abroad that an Iraqi defector confirmed the destruction of most or all of Iraq's WMDs.... Seee the report from FAIR below:

FAIR-L
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Media analysis, critiques and activism

MEDIA ADVISORY:
Star Witness on Iraq Said Weapons Were Destroyed:
Bombshell revelation from a defector cited by White House and press

February 27, 2003

On February 24, Newsweek broke what may be the biggest story of the
Iraq
crisis. In a revelation that "raises questions about whether the WMD
[weapons of mass destruction] stockpiles attributed to Iraq still
exist,"
the magazine's issue dated March 3 reported that the Iraqi weapons
chief
who defected from the regime in 1995 told U.N. inspectors that Iraq had
destroyed its entire stockpile of chemical and biological weapons and
banned missiles, as Iraq claims.

Until now, Gen. Hussein Kamel, who was killed shortly after returning
to
Iraq in 1996, was best known for his role in exposing Iraq's deceptions
about how far its pre-Gulf War biological weapons programs had
advanced.
But Newsweek's John Barry-- who has covered Iraqi weapons inspections
for
more than a decade-- obtained the transcript of Kamel's 1995 debriefing
by
officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the
U.N.
inspections team known as UNSCOM.

Inspectors were told "that after the Gulf War, Iraq destroyed all its
chemical and biological weapons stocks and the missiles to deliver
them,"
Barry wrote. All that remained were "hidden blueprints, computer disks,
microfiches" and production molds. The weapons were destroyed secretly,
in
order to hide their existence from inspectors, in the hopes of someday
resuming production after inspections had finished. The CIA and MI6
were
told the same story, Barry reported, and "a military aide who defected
with Kamel... backed Kamel's assertions about the destruction of WMD
stocks."

But these statements were "hushed up by the U.N. inspectors" in order
to
"bluff Saddam into disclosing still more."

CIA spokesman Bill Harlow angrily denied the Newsweek report. "It is
incorrect, bogus, wrong, untrue," Harlow told Reuters the day the
report
appeared (2/24/03).

But on Wednesday (2/26/03), a complete copy of the Kamel transcript--
an
internal UNSCOM/IAEA document stamped "sensitive"-- was obtained by
Glen
Rangwala, the Cambridge University analyst who in early February
revealed
that Tony Blair's "intelligence dossier" was plagiarized from a student
thesis. Rangwala has posted the Kamel transcript on the Web:
http://casi.org.uk/info/unscom950822.pdf.

In the transcript (p. 13), Kamel says bluntly: "All weapons--
biological,
chemical, missile, nuclear, were destroyed."

Who is Hussein Kamel?

Kamel is no obscure defector. A son-in-law of Saddam Hussein, his
departure from Iraq carrying crates of secret documents on Iraq's past
weapons programs was a major turning point in the inspections saga. In
1999, in a letter to the U.N. Security Council (1/25/99), UNSCOM
reported
that its entire eight years of disarmament work "must be divided into
two
parts, separated by the events following the departure from Iraq, in
August 1995, of Lt. General Hussein Kamel."

Kamel's defection has been cited repeatedly by George W. Bush and
leading
administration officials as evidence that 1) Iraq has not disarmed; 2)
inspections cannot disarm it; and 3) defectors such as Kamel are the
most
reliable source of information on Iraq's weapons.

* Bush declared in an October 7, 2002 speech: "In 1995, after several
years of deceit by the Iraqi regime, the head of Iraq's military
industries defected. It was then that the regime was forced to admit
that
it had produced more than 30,000 liters of anthrax and other deadly
biological agents. The inspectors, however, concluded that Iraq had
likely
produced two to four times that amount. This is a massive stockpile of
biological weapons that has never been accounted for, and capable of
killing millions."

* Secretary of State Colin Powell's February 5 presentation to the U.N.
Security Council claimed: "It took years for Iraq to finally admit that
it
had produced four tons of the deadly nerve agent, VX. A single drop of
VX
on the skin will kill in minutes. Four tons. The admission only came
out
after inspectors collected documentation as a result of the defection
of
Hussein Kamel, Saddam Hussein's late son-in-law."

* In a speech last August (8/27/02), Vice President Dick Cheney said
Kamel's story "should serve as a reminder to all that we often learned
more as the result of defections than we learned from the inspection
regime itself."

* Deputy National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley recently wrote in the
Chicago Tribune (2/16/03) that "because of information provided by
Iraqi
defector and former head of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
programs,
Lt. Gen. Hussein Kamel, the regime had to admit in detail how it
cheated
on its nuclear non-proliferation commitments."

The quotes from Bush and Powell cited above refer to anthrax and VX
produced by Iraq before the 1991 Gulf War. The administration has cited
various quantities of chemical and biological weapons on many other
occasions-- weapons that Iraq produced but which remain unaccounted
for.
All of these claims refer to weapons produced before 1991.

But according to Kamel's transcript, Iraq destroyed all of these
weapons
in 1991.

According to Newsweek, Kamel told the same story to CIA analysts in
August
1995. If that is true, all of these U.S. officials have had access to
Kamel's statements that the weapons were destroyed. Their repeated
citations of his testimony-- without revealing that he also said the
weapons no longer exist-- suggests that the administration might be
withholding critical evidence. In particular, it casts doubt on the
credibility of Powell's February 5 presentation to the U.N., which was
widely hailed at the time for its persuasiveness. To clear up the
issue,
journalists might ask that the CIA release the transcripts of its own
conversations with Kamel.

Kamel's disclosures have also been crucial to the arguments made by
hawkish commentators on Iraq. The defector has been cited four times on
the New York Times op-ed page in the last four months in support of
claims
about Iraq's weapons programs--never noting his assertions about the
elimination of these weapons. In a major Times op-ed calling for war
with
Iraq (2/21/03), Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution wrote that
Kamel and other defectors "reported that outside pressure had not only
failed to eradicate the nuclear program, it was bigger and more
cleverly
spread out and concealed than anyone had imagined it to be." The
release
of Kamel's transcript makes this claim appear grossly at odds with the
defector's actual testimony.

The Kamel story is a bombshell that necessitates a thorough
reevaluation
of U.S. media reporting on Iraq, much of which has taken for granted
that
the nation retains supplies of prohibited weapons. (See FAIR Media
Advisory, "Iraq's Hidden Weapons: From Allegation to Fact,"
http://www.fair.org/press-releases/iraq-weapons.html .) Kamel's
testimony
is not, of course, proof that Iraq does not have hidden stocks of
chemical
or biological weapons, but it does suggest a need for much more media
skepticism about U.S. allegations than has previously been shown.

Unfortunately, Newsweek chose a curious way to handle its scoop: The
magazine placed the story in the miscellaneous "Periscope" section with
a
generic headline, "The Defector's Secrets." Worse, Newsweek's online
version added a subhead that seemed almost designed to undercut the
importance of the story: "Before his death, a high-ranking defector
said
Iraq had not abandoned its WMD ambitions." So far, according to a
February
27 search of the Nexis database, no major U.S. newspapers or national
television news shows have picked up the Newsweek story.


***
Read the Newsweek story:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/876128.asp

***
Read Glen Rangwala's analysis of the Kamel transcript:
http://middleeastreference.org.uk/kamel.html

***
If you'd like to encourage media outlets to investigate this story,
contact information is available on FAIR's website:
http://www.fair.org/media-contact-list.html
----------
Please support FAIR by subscribing to our bimonthly magazine, Extra!
For more information, go to: http://www.fair.org/extra/subscribe.html .
Or call 1-800-847-3993.

FAIR SHIRTS: Get your "Don't Trust the Corporate Media" shirt today at
FAIR's online store:
http://www.merchantamerica.com/fair/

FAIR produces CounterSpin, a weekly radio show heard on over 130
stations in the U.S. and Canada. To find the CounterSpin station nearest you,
visit http://www.fair.org/counterspin/stations.html .

FAIR's INTERNSHIP PROGRAM: FAIR accepts internship applications for its
New York office on a rolling basis. For more information, see:
http://www.fair.org/internships.html

Feel free to respond to FAIR ( fair@fair.org ). We can't reply to
everything, but we will look at each message. We especially appreciate
documented examples of media bias or censorship. And please send copies of
your email correspondence with media outlets, including any responses,
to fair@fair.org .

You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site: http://www.fair.org . Our
subscriber list is kept confidential.
FAIR
(212) 633-6700
http://www.fair.org/
E-mail: fair@fair.org

Posted by Chris at March 17, 2003 11:38 AM
Comments

Great piece of work- your Kamel story of mar 17, 2003. Sorry I took so long to read it.

Posted by: John Gurley on June 15, 2005 04:13 PM